Islam versus Europe

I posted an article yesterday about the Swedish thought criminal who was hounded from his job at a Swedish university because of his "right wing extremist views". The claim was made that he had expressed sympathy for Breivik.

Thanks to the info posted by Anonymous in a comment, we now know the blogger is Lennart Svensson. He has two blogs, SvenssonGalaxen (Swedish) and Ersatz Moonlight (English).

Here are some extracts from a post he made on Ersatz Moonlight titled "Breivik: a Nordic Perspective".

Let me begin by stating my political position: I'm a man of the right, a radical conservative. So Breivik's criticism of muliticulturalism and islamisation ring rather true with me. I resent this whole mass immigration thing, threatening as it is the traditional European and Swedish societies, their culture and identity. The Frankfurt School with all its negativism is not my cup of tea. I'm a European traditionalist with a predilection for Jünger and Spengler. However, I don't live in a bunker. E. g. I've got a bachelor of arts in sanskrit, the classical Indian language. With a footing in Western culture I appreciate other cultures as well. I just don't want them to live off our prosperity.

So then: Nordic perspectives on Breivik. But first I have to distance myself from Breivik, right? Right. So I say: I condemn mass murder. I'm a peaceful man, preferring to peddle my ideas with peaceful means, like on this and on my Swedish blog. Also, I'm not very much into Lacoste sweaters.

...Personally Breivik is something of a narcissist, wanting to be famous or infamous. Q. v. for example the several photos posted on the internet and the manifesto with its autobiography and autointerview. He's got that Herostratic personality. But he's more than that. He's first and foremost an anarchist, a gate-opener into the far more sinister times we're heading for. We're heading out into Terra Incognita and Breivik is way ahead of us, lighting his way with a little green light, giving that uncanny sheen you get from Night Vision equipment. I mean, we're facing peak oil, depression and ongoing war in the Middle East: Libya was just a first phase, next stop Iran. On top of that we have our PC regimes brainwashing the people, continuing the program of mass immigration, and we have social unrest with incidents like Occupy Wall Street, the London riots and whatnot. Breivik might not know how good his timing was. But his deed surely comes in a more turbulent time that Kascynskis mid-nineties and Baader-Meinhof's mid-to-late seventies. I'm aware that those weren't placid times but they were more placid than our times. That's the main significance of Breivik's deed: they come in the midst of approaching turmoil for the world. 2011 was an uncommon year and 2012 will be even more stormy.

But as for the storm, I'd say, bring it on. I'm not welcoming chaos per se, but I welcome it as an instrument of change. Congenial to me seems the last lines of the first Terminator movie:
- There's a storm coming up.

- I know.

The world is changing and it won't be a picnic. But in the long run, say in some years, I think we will have left materialism and nihilism behind us and moved on into a more spiritual mode. Breivik isn't a spiritual man but he is an anarchist speeding things up, hastening the process of world change. He has intensified the whole debate, the whole agenda, the whole Zeitgeist. I don't endorse mass murder but I also don't sit idle after Utöya, simply condemning it like some absurdity. His deed was sick but so was the context he rebelled against, all this multiculturalism engaging us in a low-intense war.

I've seen the future. It's murder baby. True that. But we have to live on in 2011 and beyond, into that Prophetical Year 2012, and that is best done with a calm outlook and open eyes. To be a man of the right and say, "Breivik was just a zionist Free Mason, case closed", is far too simplistic. Breivik is a complex phenomenon, a Twilight Zone of sane thoughts and sick thoughts interlaced. So even though it's unpopular with every person, rightwingers and leftwingers alike, I'll stay in that Zone and face up to what ogres and treasures, what damselles and enemies there might be to encounter. And I'll meet them with peaceful means as a blogger and author, executing my old German right of free speech. Debate, a free exchange of ideas and points of view, an ability to present and discuss facts, even though they're uncomfortable, that's the road to take.

But not one approved by the Swedish Establishment, or even the Counterjihad Establishment if we can call it that, who, in the aftermath of the massacre, cringed and proclaimed that Breivik wasn't "one of us", when he obviously was.